P Radhakrishnan v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order recording undertaking from respondent counsel to file vakalath and directing appellant to serve waiver petition copies with an adjournment date assigned.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 489/2023
in A.IR:860/2023
P. Radhakrishnan V/S A.O.,State Bank Of India &Ors
08/12/2023
Appellant counsel present. (Princy).
AOS not filed. Seeks time.
Undertaking counsel Pugazhenthi states that Vakalath to be filed by Ld. counsel Raghavulu Naidu for R1 Bank.
Counsel Jyotsna Shivakumar and Bagavath Krishnan undertakes to file Vakalath for R4 Bank.
Appellant to serve copies of Waiver petition to both the Respondent counsels.
Call on 19/12/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P. Radhakrishnan
- respondent
A.O. State Bank Of India
- respondent
A.O. State Bank Of India (R4)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090008602023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court