Prathama Up Gramin Bank v. Mohd Saafique
Case brief
What is this about?
This is an interlocutory order in a civil appeal. The court permitted the appellant to effect service of notice through newspaper publication due to the unavailability of a tracking report and directed fresh steps to be taken within a week.
What did the court decide?
Permitted service of notice by newspaper publication; appellant to take fresh steps within a week and file proof of service by next date.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 745/2022 Date: 11.12.2023
Prathama UP Gramin Bank Vs. Mohd. Saafique
Present: Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that as the tracking report is not available, therefore, he may be permitted to take steps for service of notice upon the respondents by publication in the newspaper. Let the appellant take fresh steps within a week for service of notice upon the respondents by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 23.04.2024 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is permitted to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent by publication in the newspaper due to unavailability of tracking report.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prathama UP Gramin Bank
- respondent
Mohd. Saafique
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court