M S Poultry Sale Center v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous since the matter was settled between parties and property de-locked per below Tribunal order requiring deposit within two months.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 693/2023 Date: 04.07.2023
M/s Poultry Sale Center Vs. State Bank of India
Present: Shri Bablu, Advocate holding brief of Shri B. K. Kesharwani, counsel for the appellant, Shri Abhishek Kapariya, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has brought on record a copy of order dated 19.06.2023 passed by the Tribunal below and has stated that since the property has been de-locked and the entire amount is to be deposited within two months by the borrower as mentioned in the order itself of the Tribunal below. Therefore, it is contended that the appeal filed against the interim order has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the appellant agrees to the contention as raised by the counsel for the respondent-Bank.
In view of the above and the fact that since the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore, the appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Poultry Sale Center
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · LD Registrar
- Order 2 — this page · Rajesh Dayal Khare
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court