The appellant failed to comply with office objections appointed on the appeal. Consequently, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai declined the appeal under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
Appeal declined under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 for non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:998/2023
National Highway Authority Of India V/S Union Bank Of India
01/09/2023
None for Appellant today also.
None of the office objections are complied yet.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in time.
Sd/Registrar
National Highway Authority Of India
Union Bank Of India
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
