The DRT disposed of an appeal as withdrawn. The parties filed consent terms, and the appellant undertook to make payments per the settlement. The court directed parties to seek further remedies before the DRT-II.
The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn based on consent terms filed by both parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 455/2023 (WoD)
In Diary No. 928/2023
Between
Nagamma Yallappa Bhotre & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Greater Bombay Co-Operative Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Rahul Tripathi, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Advait Hattangadi, i/b M/s. Raval Shah & Co., Advocate for the Respondents.
-: Order dated: 25/07/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Appellants and the 1st Respondent Bank filed consent terms on the basis of which the appeal is sought to be withdrawn.
The terms of settlement have been recorded and the Appellant undertakes to make payment in accordance with the settlement which has been arrived at. Recording those terms, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
The parties are directed to seek further remedies before the Debts Recovery Tribunal- II, Mumbai (D.R.T) where the S.A. is pending.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-31
1
Nagamma Yallappa Bhotre & Ors.
The Greater Bombay Co-Operative Bank & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
