Muthulakshmi, v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a noting order in an individual application regarding a delay plea. The court recorded that the counsel for the third respondent did not propose to file a counter. No substantive issues were decided or disposition recorded in this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 174/2023 in A.IR:354/2023
Muthulakshmi V/S Union Bank Of India & Ors
17/08/2023
None for Appellant.
Representing counsel Chetan Prakash for R3 present and informs that he has not proposed to file counter in IA 174/ 2023 (Delay).
None for R1,R2, and R4.
Counter of R1 and R2 already filed.
Call before Hon’ble Chairperson on 08/09/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Muthulakshmi
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
- respondent
R3
- respondent
R1
- respondent
R2
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090003542023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court