Mukesh Jaiswal v. Bank of Baroda and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order discussing an adjournment request due to counsel unavailability and closing the right to file a reply to a waiver application.
What did the court decide?
Listed for waiver on 09.04.2024. Right of respondents to file reply to waiver application is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 13/2023 Date: 19.12.2023
Mukesh Jaiswal Vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Present: Shri Akshat Agarwal along with Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, Shri S. K. Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Ayur Jain, counsel for the respondent-Auction Purchaser,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank that the arguing counsel Shri Avinash Jaiswal is indisposed, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
The office report dated 18.12.2023 shows that no reply has been filed by the respondents to the waiver application inspite of last opportunity being granted. Accordingly, the right of the respondents to file reply of the waiver application stands closed.
List this case on 09.04.2024 for waiver.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mukesh Jaiswal
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Respondent-Auction Purchaser
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090000132023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court