The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the appellant failed to make the pre-deposit ordered on 14.02.2023. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
Appeal dismissed as not maintainable; pending interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 77 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A.I.R. No.991 of 2019 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
20.04.2023 M/s Choice Pracitech India Pvt. Ltd. & ors … Appellant -VsState Bank of India ….Respondents Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant Mr. S.Pal Chowdhury, Learned Counsel Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Compliance of the order dated 14.02.2023 regarding pre-deposit is not made. Accordingly, Appeal is not maintainable.
Appeal is dismissed being not maintainable.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
2
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 20th April, 2023 3/tp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal is maintainable in the absence of compliance with a pre-deposit order.
M/s Choice Pracitech India Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
