Mr Krishnamurthy Padmanabhan v. Mahila Co. Operative Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT at Chennai declined the appeal for non-compliance of office objections, specifically the furnishing of the Certified Copy of the Impugned Order.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:319/2022
Sri Krishnamurthy Padmanabhan & Anr V/S A.O., The Mahila Co Operative Bank Ltd
03/03/2023
None for Appellant.
Most of the office objections are complied except that relating to furnishing Certified Copy of the Impugned Order with full cause title.
Despite sufficient opportunities given in this matter, the pending objection is yet to be complied.
Accordingly, the Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994, as office objections are not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sri Krishnamurthy Padmanabhan & Anr
- respondent
A.O., The Mahila Co Operative Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 331090003192022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court