Mr C Devadasa Sundaram v. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal on compliance of office objections. No substantive judgment. Registry to verify; hearing called.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:449/2022
C.Devadasa Sundaram V/S A.O., Pegasus Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd
03/04/2023
Appellant counsel present.
All the office objections are complied and in respect of objection in respect to Column No. ‘8’ Appellant has given undertaking including therewith copy of Review Application filed before DRT-III, Chennai and states that if Review Application is allowed, Appeal will be withdrawn in due course of time.
Registry to verify.
Call on 13/04/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C. Devadasa Sundaram
- respondent
Pegasus Asset Reconstruction Pvt Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court