Disposed
Mohd Alam v. prathama up Gramin bank
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An appeal against a debt recovery order was filed at the Allahabad Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal but the case was declined to register due to unremoved defects despite multiple opportunities given to the party.
What did the court decide?
None; case declined to be registered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
¶2
Dy. No. 89/2023
¶3
Mohd Alam V/S prathama up Gramin bank
¶4
Date: 17/10/2023
¶5
None present.
¶6
The case was filed on 19.01.2023, but the defects have not been removed despite giving several opportunities.
¶7
The case is declined to register.
¶8
Registrar ALLAHABAD DRAT
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mohd Alam
- respondent
Prathama Up Gramin Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 091090000892023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court