Mr Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal granted applications for extension of time and restoration of an appeal dismissed for default, subject to the payment of costs to the Respondent Bank.
What did the court decide?
Extension of time and restoration of appeal granted subject to payment of ₹1 lakh cost to the respondent.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 19/2023
&
M.A. No. 26/2023
In
(Appeal on Diary No. 31/2023-Disposed of)
Between
Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
Mr Minesh K. Shah, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Chetan Shah, i/b Mr Rajesh L. Shethia, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 28/03/2023:-
M.A. No. 19 of 2023 is an application seeking an extension of time to comply with a direction of this Tribunal to make a pre-deposit of
₹6 lakhs.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant an extension of time for pre-deposit and restore an appeal dismissed for default considering the appellant's impecunious situation and partial payment.
Whether to impose costs on the appellant for granting relief.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dbm Geotechnics Constructions Pvt. Ltd. versus Hdfc Bank Ltd.
Assest Reconstruction Company (I) Ltd. versus Quick N Safe Service Private Limited & Ors.
Asset Reconstruction Company (I) Ltd. versus Image Plus(India) Private Limited & Ors.
J C Flowers Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. In the matter between Yes Bank versus Belief Realtors Pvt. Ltd.