Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal Mumbai dismissed an application for restoration of an appeal and a writ petition due to non-appearance of the appellants at the hearing.
Application for restoration dismissed for default; miscellaneous applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson M.A. No. 24/2023 (Restoration) In
[M.A. No. 349/2015(WoD)-Disposed of] In (Appeal No. 136/2015-Disposed of)
Between
Abdul Munaf Baba Patel & Ors. V/s. IDBI Bank Ltd. Ms A. W. Barve, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 22/09/2023:-
This is an application for restoration of the application and the appeal which is dismissed for default. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 17.08.2023, there was no representation for the Appellants. Today the Appellants and their counsel remain absent.
Hence, it is assumed that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the matter.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank is ready for hearing.
Hence, the application for restoration is dismissed for default. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-17
1
Abdul Munaf Baba Patel & Ors.
IDBI Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
