Aniruddha R.mishra v. Recovery Officer-Ii, Drt,Nagpur
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. MUMBAI
r
Mlsc Application No. of20 2.)
I. No.
In
Appeal No. of 20
P n iTTudcl ha (R • ' S H 2^0 .
Appellants
1
(Advocate iQrirl h p cd
J
Versus
I
Pe-CervefTTj c-e'^T- IV DiQT f^a^pu^jtopomientB I I
(Advocate. i
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar^ order / Chairperson’s Orders
I ^/0£/2G^ cJv * Aa'er-M Fo^- App^Jicim4^.
f\lone_ 'ftjy Ce^pooden-k- -
As
Ad<oc<d4
OFrxo’H'ce upor> 5^Poc/€p
ca Aralov i'F'
Pf.p^.nc.fcRePh)
fxdj < fc>^' P05>
'2'>|0j)fc0'23 Pidiv* Acxtr^' SovarrncA Po^r App^an'H
r\lor\e_ ftizr p<Lspor\cl en h- ■
|AcK/ctoJ-A ft'ZT fippejlanl-seeA Wme
roHce
i p<\e Je-3A»’’ce afPcl<N'H
pjj ^poUppp^-^15'^
!
fxXGj^A'C^, p> i <y&} \ \ 1 O - 2_qj 2^
I
P.T.O.
f
Contd Sheet
| Date | Office Notes, Appearances and Registrar's order/Chairperson’s Orders |
|---|---|
| 2 o /1 A /ODOS | (Norxe FbTr bo Vh Pcrs-bfes. ’ i /oaq / F\4j 4^> ]S<OI/ZO^ |
| • lQ-e-9 us a- |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court