Mr Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The adjudicator listed a matter for hearing by way of praecipe filed for urgent relief. No substantive disposition was made in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson M.A. No. 19/2023 In
(Appeal on Diary No. 31/2023-Disposed of)
Between
Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi. V/s.
Bank of Baroda
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Mr. Minesh K Shah, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Chetan Shah, i/b Mr. Rajesh S, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 03/03/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by the Appellant seeking urgent relief. For a reply on M.A., the Respondent’s counsel seeks time.
Post on 17.03.2023 for reply/hearing.
rm-3
Sd/Chairperson
1
Ranjeet Darshan Punjabi
Bank of Baroda
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court