Vinodkumar Ramgopalji Gilada v. Cfm Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
|IH
Pm
if
&-■-
Av >■
_r _•
■‘ ;
iv..
>:- ■;
^^1
bb|w.
51
6^023
IV
Qg/ii/To-zs|.
■
•
f
^ 7 o) Z'202 ^ .
J
'X(C-^ ist-n^Tr
• •Ir •"
r
T. : h-
t
;r
■':'';'S
or| brj Chairperson's Orders
~T ftiTT RppeJ’a^
pjone PCTT >PespoHderf .
PcV. foTT ApP^”Q'
ruoNOJ oro^pL^.
^^6^oJ VPdeFectS •V) ^b ivzo^
no ^e bo+ip Pcnrtfes.
PidJ Pots' Remov'aJ o'PcjeF-ecfcs
;.j'6fflcfl NdlWi’A'ppearariceo
_________ and Rogldtrar’s c.j,
__________
RcAv’ Piny
y\lv- seek +im€‘ ‘-ftlTRf —
rmos/oJ oPdcpec-^
P>4j
• -
• ■'! I f.|* .
4?s
f
1
. -_|
|---|---|---|---|
I ■■'
L .■
^BTSRECOyERY APPELLATE TRIBUNA1
MU MBAS
Miso ApplicationIn No, _ of 20 UeHoT '- -------
^ppoaf No. S'! of 20 2-3 JTrtZ , 7
~
. . P/ZV .
VT vuc40 (<
* ... Appoints
'(Advocate.
Versus
Aw RospondenU
(Advocate
)
Dsto Office Notes) Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chalrperoon’fl Orders
Appeal presented by.
Advocate for Appellant with Ci.D, / JP0 of Rs. on
being aggrieved / orderby the Impugned order
passed on ^-O ^^^^3 in S.A. No. 1 of 2.0^1
by DRTr _u/s 7D of R D n n & p ] ah 1093^ / -[g of
S.A.R.F.A.eTs.I. Act. 2002.
Exh - 1 Appeal Memo
S.O. for compliance to PC-' (O ^2-0
j
i
REGISTRAR
. ... * -----
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court