Bank of Baroda v. Skyline Construction Company and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 59/2022
Between
Bank of Baroda
V/s.
Skyline Construction Company & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr Amir Arshiwala along with Ms Sabeena Mahadik, Mr Pankaj Utradhi and Ms Nupur Shah i/b M/s. S. R. Legal, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Charles D’Souza, i/b Mr. Alok Mishra, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 10/03/2023:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent borrower
submits that the moratorium has been allowed in the IBC
proceedings against the Respondent company. Under the circumstances, the Bank may not be able to proceed against them. He seeks time to produce the with an affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Skyline Construction Company & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court