Appeal declined in DRAT. Appeal filed by V.P. Thama raiselvi against Dhanalakshmi Bank dismissed for non-compliance of office objections including deficit court fee within the stipulated time under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
Appeal declined under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 due to non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:35/2023
V.P.Thama raiselvi V/S Dhanalakshmi Bank
02/05/2023
None for Appellant.
Few Office objections including Deficit Court fee are not complied yet despite sufficient time given.
Hence, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.P. Thama raiselvi
Dhanalakshmi Bank
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
