Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza v. State Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 1215/2023
Between
Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr R.P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr. Ismail Nasikwala, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant undertakes to clear the defects pointed out by the office, and in doing so, the appeal shall be taken on file. The Respondents are at liberty to file a reply on the appeal.
The Appellant has also filed an application for maintaining the status quo with regard to the secured assets. The auction purchasers had appeared and sought time to file a reply.
The auction purchaser is directed not to create any third-party interest in the property till the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hashmi Sayed Nisar Ahmed Sayed Murtuza
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court