In an appeal against an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Delhi court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's non-prosecution and failure to appear, despite multiple notices being issued to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 30/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 22/2022 (DRT — Ill, Delhi)
Anand Bhardwaj Vs M/s Capri Global Capital Limited
27.01.2023 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
None for respondents
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. Appellant has not filed affidavit of service today also though notice to respondent was issued thrice i.e. on 31.05.2022, 21.07.2022 and 20.09.2022.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( CHAIRPERSON )
-pk
Anand Bhardwaj
M/s Capri Global Capital Limited
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
