Challenge by reputable bank's counsel regarding lack of instruction for the respondent despite the matter being posted for settlement. No substantive ruling made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 83/2022 (Stay) In Misc. Appeal No. 24/2022
Between0
M/s. S.K. Tim b er, through its proprietor Shri Ajay S/o Subhas h chandra Mehta &Anr. V/s.
…Appellant/s
Canara Bank, t h rough its Authorized Officer, …Respondent/s Nagpur
Mr. Radhe Agra w al, Advocate for Appellant. An Advocate for the Respondent is present.
-: Order dated: 28/04/2023:-
It is submi t ted by the Ld. Counsel appearing f or the Appellant that the matter has been posted before the Adalat f or settlement on 30.04.2023 being held in the premises of D.R.T.- N a gpur.
The Ld. C o unsel appearing for the Bank is absolutely in the dark and it is ve r y strange that the bank has not i n structed the Ld. Counsel.
Post on 26. 0 5.2023 for hearing
Sd/Chairperson
rm-21
1
M/s. S.K. Timber
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
