The Appellant's counsel admitted there were no valid points to argue. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the refusal of cross-examination without costs.
Appeal dismissed without costs; all pending IAs stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MA 22/2021
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 8th of June, 2023
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravi Kumar CHAIRPERSON
MA 22/2021
[IA 1055/2018 in OA 305/2017 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai]
Between
Canara Bank, Tondairpet Branch, No.50, G A Road, Tondairpet, Chennai – 21.
….. Respondent Counsel for Appellants : M/s. R. Chandrasudan Counsel for Respondent : Mr. S. Kesavan
1
MA 22/2021
ORDER
Appellants submitted there is no valid point to argue this case and orders may be passed. As Advocate for Appellants himself stated that there is no point to advance arguments, Appeal MA 22/2021 is dismissed, but under circumstance, without costs. All pending IAs, if any, stand closed.
[Dictated to Athistamani, PS, in open court, transcribed by her, corrected and signed by me, this 8th of June, 2023]
[ Justice S. Ravi Kumar]
CHAIRPERSON
2
M/s. Ganekar & Co., Proprietor Sri. V. Elangovan
M. Velayutham
Canara Bank
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
