D Chandrika v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Brief note indicating that the messenger for the respondent-bank sought further time for filing vakalath. Case adjourned to 7.8.2023. No substantive adjudication.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 266/2023 in
MA (SA) 21/2023
D.Chandrika Vs A.O, Union Bank Of India And 2 Ors
04/08/2023
Ld. Counsel for petitioner/appellant reported ready. Advocate Shri V. Arvind Rajagopal sought further time for filing vakalath for R2 bank and also counter.
For vakalath and counter of R2 bank and for hearing, posted to 7.8.2023.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D. Chandrika
- respondent
A.O.
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court