Dean that the appeal filed in this matter has been declined because the registrar has not been able to clear the related office objections, specifically citing non-compliance regarding pending matters and deficit court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:458/2022
Suresh Kumar Pk V/S Indian Bank And Ors
28/03/2023
None for Appellant.
Despite numerous opportunities given on previous occasions, office objections have not complied till date and a few objections like Deficit Court Fee are still pending for compliance.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 as office objections have not been complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Suresh Kumar Pk
Indian Bank And Ors
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
