The Delhi Nagar Nigam Corporation challenged the Bombay High Court’s judgment upholding the validity of a land acquisition scheme. The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 07/2023
Askar Realities Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
And
Misc. Appeal No. 8/2023
Askar Realities Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
And
Misc. Appeal No. 9/2023
Nakoda Bhairav Developer Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
And
Misc. Appeal No. 10/2023
Askar Realities Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
And
1
Misc. Appeal No. 11/2023
Nakoda Bhairav Developer Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Ms Mumtaz Khan, i/b Mr Ritesh Patadia, Advocate for Appellants. Mr K. D. Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Replies have been filed in these appeals by the Respondent Bank.
The interlocutory applications purportedly filed by the Appellant have not come up for hearing because of some defects pointed out by the Office.
The defects shall be cured, and on doing so, the application shall be posted before the Bench for hearing.
Post on 06.06.2023 before the Registrar for curing the defects.
mks- 14-18
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interlocutory applications filed by the Appellants could be admitted despite defects pointed out by the Tribunal Office?
Askar Realities Pvt. Ltd.
Nakoda Bhairav Developer Pvt. Ltd.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
