The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed in a one-line order the absence of the appellant from hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A(S.A):8/2023
Lic Housing Finance Ltd V/S
PullarapakkamNamachivaya Thirunavukkarasu Chandru
13/12/2023
No representation for respondent. Ld. Counsel for appellant institution sought further time.
This matter is posted to 28.8.2023 under the caption of ‘dismissal’, as appellant was absent on 6.7.2023. On 28.8.2023, at request of advocate for appellant, matter is adjourned to this date under the same caption of ‘dismissal’ in order to give an opportunity to appellant to proceed with the case. In spite of accommodating the appellant, no interest is evinced in prosecuting the case today and appellant again sought for time. Request for further time is refused.
In view of the same, Appeal, MA (SA) 8/2023 is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
Chairperson
Lic Housing Finance Ltd
PullarapakkamNamachivaya Thirunavukkarasu Chandru
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
