The Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal in default against non-appearance and non-compliance with deposit requirements. Neither party nor counsel appeared before the bench through video conferencing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc Appeal No. 01/2021 Arising out of S.A. No. 45/2020 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Om Prakash & Others Vs The Authorized Officer, PNB & Others.
10.01.2023 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Ld. Counsel for respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of appellant despite repeated calls. Perusal of record reveals that even pre-deposit has also not been made by the appellant till date.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed in default.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Om Prakash & Others
The Authorized Officer, PNB & Others
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
