The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the appeal MA(S.A) 19/2022 for lack of prosecution. The bench found no interest in prosecuting the matter despite previous adjournments.
The Appeal MA (SA) 19/2022 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A(S.A):19/2022
Smt.Jeyarathinam @ Siriyapushpam V/S A.O., Canara Bank & Ors
09/08/2023
Representing counsel for appellant sought further time.
This Appeal is coming up under the caption of ‘dismissal’ since December, 2022. In spite of granting adjournments, no interest is evinced by appellant in prosecuting the matter. Today, Counsel representing appellant sought further time. I am not inclined to grant further time.
Therefore, Appeal MA (SA) 19/2022 is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/Chairperson
Smt.Jeyarathinam @ Siriyapushpam
A.O., Canara Bank & Ors
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
