An application for substituted service was allowed for unclaimed respondents. The appellant was directed to file an affidavit for substituted service.
Appellant directed to file affidavit for substituted service in respect of Respondents 2 and 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 538/2022 in A.IR:253/2022
M/S Karnataka State Warehousing Corporation V/S The Federal Bank Ltd & Ors
25/01/2023
Appellant counsel present.
AOS is filed in respect of R1 to R3.
R1 served.
R2 & R3 returned as unclaimed.
None for R1.
Appellant to file Affidavit for substituted service in respect of R2 & R3.
Call on 07/02/2023.
Sd/Registrar
M/S Karnataka State Warehousing Corporation
The Federal Bank Ltd
As recorded by the court registry
24 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
