The DRT-Appeals Tribunal dismissed a miscellaneous appeal against an interlocutory order of DR-T No.-III, Mumbai, as it had become infructuous since the underlying S.A. was disposed of. No representation was filed by the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 131/2022
Between
Sachin Navin Sheregar & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorised Officer,
L & T Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr Tapan Agarwal, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated: 29/08/2023:-
No representation for the Appellants.
Misc. Appeal is filed against the interlocutory order passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal No.-III, Mumbai (D.R.T.) in S.A. No. 28 of 2022.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 submits that S.A. has been disposed of vide order dated 27.06.2023 by the D.R.T.-
III, Mumbai. Hence, the Misc. Appeal has become infructuous.
Misc. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed as become infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-16
1
Sachin Navin Sheregar & Anr.
The Authorised Officer, L & T Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
