Appeal for default. The appellant failed to appear and were not served notice. The tribunal observed that the appellant is not keen on prosecuting the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for default. Misc. Applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 122/2022
Between
Corporation Bank
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Mr. Kirit Fulchand Ravani & Ors. …Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 06/10/2023:-
There is no appearance for the Appellant in this matter. Notice has also not been served on Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and the Registry has noticed that no steps have been taken despite being granted sufficient time.
Hence, it appears that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting
the appeal.
The appeal stands dismissed for default.
Misc. Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
rm-14
Sd/Chairperson
1
Corporation Bank
Mr. Kirit Fulchand Ravani
Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
