The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for default as the appellant was absent on the scheduled hearing date despite being posted under a caption of dismissal.
Appeal MA 120/2011 is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 7th day of December, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
MA 120/2011
(Appeal No.1/2010 against MA No.196/2009 in DRC No.167/2003 in TA No.361/2001 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
R. Raja Rajeswari & R. Rajeswari W/o Mr. K.M. Ramesh, Old No.148, New No.4/35, Ranjith Nagar, Neelangarai, Chennai 41.
….Appellant
And
…Respondents
Counsel for Appellant : M/s G. Thangavel & Co. Counsel for R1 Bank : M/s Aiyar & Donia Counsel for R2 : Shri Chithira Puthiran
1
ORDER
No representation for appellant. Ld. Counsel for R1 bank reported ready.
This matter is posted to this date for dismissal as appellant was absent on previous hearing i.e., 13.10.2023.
To give an opportunity to the appellant, matter is posted to this date under the caption of ‘dismissal”. In spite of that, appellant evinced no interest in prosecuting the appeal.
Therefore, Appeal MA 120/2011 is dismissed for default.
Sd/[Justice S. Ravi Kumar] CHAIRPERSON
2
R. Raja Rajeswari & R. Rajeswari
Indian Bank, Otteri Branch
V. Radhakrishnan
S. Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
