Manikandan S v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In a Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal matter posted for dismissal, the Chairperson refused a request for further time due to non-appearance and dismissed the application, leading to rejection of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 9th Day of June, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 313/2021 (Delay)
In
AIR 74/2021
(TA 92/2018 on the file of DRT-I, Chennai)
Between
S. Manikandan Reddiar Street, Sirupakkam Village and post, Malayanur Village, Tittakudi Taluk Cuddalore District.
…Appellant
And
Canara Bank, Represented by its Sr. Manager, Nainarpalayam Branch, Nainarpalayam, Villupuram District 606 301.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant could be granted further time to argue when the matter was posted for dismissal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Manikandan
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
S. Ravi Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 331090000742021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
25 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court