Lovely Jose v. Payyanur Cooperative Town Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 411/2022 In A.IR:298/2022
Lovely Jose V/S Payyannur Co Operative Town Bank & Anr
11/01/2023
None for Appellant.
Ld. Counsel V. Prakash files Vakalath for R1 & R2..
Respondent counsel informs that he has not yet received Documents from Appellant despite instructions given to the Appellant counsel.
Appellant is again directed to serve the same to the Respondent counsel In terms of Rules 13 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 in the office of Registrar on 20/01/2023.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lovely Jose
- respondent
Payyannur Co Operative Town Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090002982022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court