Laly Joseph v. Idbi Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was declined because office objections were not complied within the reasonable time stipulated under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined due to non-compliance of office objections.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:308/2022
Laly Joseph V/S Idbi Bank Ltd
04/01/2023
Representing counsel for Appellant present.
It is noted that office objections are not complied yet despite considerable time given.
Hence, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994, as office objections are not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Laly Joseph
- respondent
Idbi Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090003082022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court