Lalithamani v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal is declined under Rule 6(4) of DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 as objections were not submitted in time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:704/2023
Lalithamani V/S Canara Bank
17/08/2023
None for Appellant.
None of the objections complied yet.
Accordingly, Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections are not complied in time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lalithamani
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 331090007042023
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court