P K Kerala Varma v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal rejected the appellant's appeal due to non-compliance with a conditional order requiring a specific deposit, refusing further time under Section 21 of the RDB Act, 1993.
What did the court decide?
The appeal AIR 101/2023 is rejected for non-compliance of Order dated 09.03.2023; pending IAs are closed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI Dated the 27th day of March, 2023
PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 101/2023 in AIR : 101/2023
(Appeal No.4/2022 in DRC No. 646/2002 in TA No.7/2000 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
P.K.Kerala Varma, Flat No. F1, Block 10, Chinthavalap Flats, Ram Mohan Road, Kozhikode – 673 004.
… Appellant
And
State Bank of India, Bank Road, Kozhikode - 673 001
…Respondent
Counsel for Appellant : Mr. TS Rajeev Gandhi
1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be rejected for non-compliance with the conditional order requiring statutory deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.K.Kerala Varma
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
S.Ravi Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 331090001012023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court