Jineshkumar Shah v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The first instalment of the mandatory pre-deposit was not paid within the time limit and no extension was granted; the appeal stands dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No. 588/2022
Between
Jineshkumar Jayantilal Shah & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr Anshul A., i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Ms Mital Parikh, alog with Bidan, i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondents. Nos. 1 & 2.
Mr Puneet Gogad, i/b Ms Abhineeta Chaturvedi & Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
-: Order dated: 08/02/2023:-
Since the first instalment of pre-deposit has not been paid on time and neither is there any extension granted to pay the amount the appeal stands dismissed as already recorded in the order.
rm-2
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jineshkumar Jayantilal Shah & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court