Disposed
P Jacquline Marahatham v. State Bank of India
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Registrar's order adjourning an application to a later date at the request of the respondent bank's counsel. No substantive decision was rendered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
IA 459/2023 in IA 458/2023
¶3
in
¶4
AIR (SA) 1473/23
¶5
P Jacquline Marahatham Vs A.O., State Bank Of India
¶6
28/11/2023
¶7
Advocate Shri B. Raghavulu Naidu filed vakalath for respondent bank and also counter in IA 458/2023 (waiver) and sought time for arguments.
¶8
At request of Ld. Counsel for respondent bank, posted to 7.12.2023 for hearing.
¶9
Sd/-
¶10
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
A. Njaculine Marahatham
- respondent
A.O., State Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090014732023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court