Stone Yuug v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants time to the appellant to file a rejoinder to the respondent's reply and sets a date for hearing the application for waiver of deposit. The ad-interim stay is continued.
What did the court decide?
Time granted for filing rejoinder; hearing fixed for 16.02.2023 on waiver application; ad-interim stay continued.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.624/2022 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No.1328/2022
Between
Stone Yuug Corporation & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
Mr Narendra L. Karamchandani, along with Ms Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr Sachin Fuladi, along with Mr U. Fuladi, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by the Appellant seeking urgent relief. Reply has been filed by the Bank and the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant seeks time to file a rejoinder to that reply.
Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within a week with an advance copy to the other side.
Post on 16.02.2023 for hearing on the application for waiver of deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Stone Yuug Corporation & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court