Hans Ispat Lts v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Court recorded that respondents failed to file replies to the I.A. No. 605/2022 seeking waiver of deposit and granted further time for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to respondents to file reply to I.A. No. 605/2022
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 605/2022(WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 716/2022
Between
Hans Ispat Lts … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s Ms. Madhavi D o shi, along with Ms. Aanandini T ., Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Aarti , Advo c ate for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Harsh, alon g with Mr. Rajat Jain, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. Ms. Mumtaz, Ad v ocate for Respondent No. 4.
-: Order dated: 26/04/2023:-
Reply to I.A. No. 605/2022 was directed t o be filed within two weeks, but R espondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 have n o t filed the replies so far and seeks f urther time.
It is record e d that there is no reply to the appl i cation. Post on 19. 0 5.2023 for hearing on waiver of d e posit. Sd/Chairperson
rm-4
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hans Ispat Lts
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court