In an interim application filed during a miscellaneous appeal, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal Mumbai credited a praecipe for urgent relief but has not disposed of the matter; the hearing was next post-posed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 560/2023 In Misc. Appeal No. 83/2023
Between
Nitin Patilbua Ugale … Appellant/s V/s.
Canara Bank …Respondent/s
Mr Charles D’Souza along with Mr V. N. Ajikumar, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Vaishali R. Bhilare, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr Sachin P. Borhade, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 17/08/2023:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe dated 16.08.2023 filed by the Appellant for seeking urgent relief.
Post on 22.08.2023 for hearing.
mks-5
Sd/Chairperson
1
Nitin Patilbua Ugale
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
