Ankush Agarwal and Anr. v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Unable to determine content due to illegible, fragmented, and largely OCR-corrupted text with no discernible judgment narrative.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
F
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPEL I ILte TRIRi INAL. MUMBAI
Ml«c Application No. .of 20
in 1.1 o. ■
Appeal No. I g of2(T^3
s Agaaxo aj Arv?r
Appellants
(Advocate i‘ F rCn<?haJ <
J
Versus |
cJna^ra^hi-^ •
Sank O'k Respondents
(Advocate.
)
Date Office Notes, Appearances
_______ and Registrar’s order / Chairperson’s Orders
131 |2/QCf?3
oj (—0525’ |f5 |cir»4~' -
Rts FSesponden-V J| |
rMv iFo-er Appellse|k +'f , -
'Hijne +ak\ncj
pjj As.-zr^+eP^' ki 'ZS I aslQs+ chance.
(Advocate.
P.T.O.
I
sjepjQ s.uosjedJieMO / JQPJO s.JejjsjBoy pue
e^ea
seouejeeddv'seiON eoiUO .
;eeqs p;uoq
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court