Appeal withdrawn due to default as appellants with no counsel appeared. Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous without engaging with merits.
Appeal dismissed for default; interlocutory applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal on Diary No.810/2022
Between
M/s Swastik Corporation & Ors. … Appellant/s
V/s.
…Respondent/s
IndusInd Bank Ltd. & Anr. Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
The Counsel who was appearing for the Appellants withdrew the vakalatnama on 26.09.2023. Time was granted for engaging another Counsel.
Today when the matter was taken up, neither the Appellants nor any Counsel is appearing for the Appellants.
I assume that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson mks-12
1
M/s Swastik Corporation & Ors.
IndusInd Bank Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
