In Appeal No. 88/2019, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the applicant's application to set aside an ex-parte order against Respondents 1(a), 1(b), 2, and 3, noting the Appellant had no objection.
Ex-parte order dated 26.09.2022 made against Respondents is set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 440/2023 (Setting aside ex-parte)
In
Appeal No. 88/2019
Between
Punjab and Sind Bank … Appellant/s V/s. M/s. Nova Aluminum Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s D.B. Raghani, i/b M/s. Hardas & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Mr. H.M. Chandurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1, 1(a), 1 (b), 2 & 3
Mr. Ashish Killedar, Advocate for Respondent No.7
-: Order dated: 13/09/2023:-
I.A. No. 440/2023 is an application filed by Respondent Nos. 1 (a) & 1 (b), 2, and 3 for setting aside an ex-parte order made against them by this Tribunal vide order dated 26.09.2022.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant has no objection to allowing the application.
Hence, the application is allowed.
The ex-parte order made against the aforementioned Respondents is set aside. They have already filed a reply to the appeal.
The pleadings are complete.
Post on 24.11.2023 for hearing.
psa-15
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application filed for setting aside an ex-parte order should be allowed.
Punjab and Sind Bank
M/s. Nova Aluminum Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
