Smt Varshaben Hitendrakumar Gheewala v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAT
4fo
I.A. NO. : OF 20 2-0- Diary No of
In
Diary No.: g^-a. OF 20 ■ I
Appellants
(Advocate
Versus
f >
Respondents
, (Advocate
1 ____________________________________________ i . ‘ ' 1i I
Date Office ijiotes, ^ppea rance
& Registrar's oijder/Chairperson's order
KfjUfM ' fhy
\ '^r
1 v
lU^ove^1
i
4 IV ' .
< ^4-
»
d-tQ ^/oy^Q-2> c<9f ^
J
P.T.O.
-C^ > 4/@.
Date
Office Notes, Appearance & Registrar's order/ Chairperson's order
KM r (/eM A.* U,1<A "k o/efejj ft? ^0? Pic!n ■ V<(asV>aJ Savujarx-V ifb'zr pv-ppeAlan+■. -2.3/OSI'2d/23 Pck/ • INi Icsk 8amne ’fb-zr pzk/occsJ-e fixzT Pipp-dhnk see< "2 Pemo-vaJ <5(c'’s"■ p4j Vo I'Z/lo/^^3- \Q./ 10 I 'Zo'23 AcV/- |<kJ5V\oJ SauJan^ Fb'zr - . CxMesl^ Qqmrxe. Fott P-e^PO^enV--.. rxJx/OCcJ-e fb-zr PMPF ellaiAA- Stds Hrf^ A^|Pemoved o'P di-e-f^c-KrFbTT Pemoyaj ofckA’cls b 3o/ll/202>3.
C' 1 -S+?rq
■yo-|(-2o2^
Due to administrative reason,
board discharged. 2-°l-o l"2o2^^
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shree Krishna Ingots Biloshi India Pvt. Ltd. versus Punjab National Bank (Oriental Bank of Commerce)
Mr. Usmani Amjad Mukhtar and Anr. versus Hdfc Ltd.
Punjab National Bank versus M/S. Akspa Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Chif Manager Authorised Officer of Bank of India versus M/S Adarsh Nagrik Dudh Utpadan Sanstha