The court noted an intervening application by an auction purchaser is defective, directed expeditious steps to cure defects, and posted the matter for hearing.
Directions issued for curing defects in the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 379/2023(Stay) In
Misc. Appeal No. 82/2023
Between
M/s A.B. Waluj … Appellant/s V/s. Recovery Officer, D.R.T.-I, Mumbai & Anr …Respondent/s
Mr I Nasikwala, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Sunil Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
-: Order dated: 02/08/2023:-
An application has been filed by the intervener auction purchaser of the secured assets. The application is defective and needs to be cured.
Steps may be taken expeditiously to cure those defects.
Post on 28.08.2023 for hearing before the bench.
rm-16
Sd/Chairperson
1
M/s A.B. Waluj
Recovery Officer, D.R.T.-I, Mumbai
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
