The I.A. seeking condonation of delay in receiving a reply to Misc. Appeal No. 99 of 2011 stands allowed on production of ₹2,000/- cost to the D.R.T. Bar Association.
The application for receiving the reply out of time stands allowed contingent upon payment of ₹2,000/- to the D.R.T. Bar Association, Mumbai.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 366/2023 In Misc. Appeal No.99/2011
Between
Goldie Sud … Appellant/s
V/s.
Punjab National Bank & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Ms Sushmita Chauhan, i/b M/s. Intralegal, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
The application as I.A. No. 366 of 2023 is filed in Misc. Appeal No. 99 of 2011 to receive the reply out of time filed by the first Respondent.
The application has not been taken on file for the reason that the notice has not been served on Respondents Nos. 2, 3 & 5. It is pertinent to note that those Respondents are already ex-parte. Therefore, the notices to those Respondents are dispensed with. The application shall be taken on file. The application is only for condoning the delay in receiving the reply. The reply shall be received on the payment of cost ₹2,000/- to the D.R.T. Bar Association, Mumbai for the purchase of books and periodicals within a week.
Post on 22.06.2023 before the Registrar for reporting compliance.
mks-17
1
Goldie Sud
Punjab National Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
