M/S. Lloyd Fast Food and Restaurant v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order noting appearance of counsel, granting time to reply, and posting the appeal for hearing on 17.03.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 361/2022 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 257/2022
Between
M/s. Lloyd Fast Food & Restaurant & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s. Canara Bank & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Sachin Kaikini, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Akbar Rizvi, i/b M/s. AUS Legal Consultant, Advocate for Respondent.
Mr. Atul Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 3
Respondents No.1 and 2 have filed replies.
Respondent No.3 appear and files Vakaltnama today, and seeks
time to file a reply.
Post on 17.03.2023 for hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Lloyd Fast Food & Restaurant & Ors.
- respondent
Canara Bank & Ors.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court