In an interim application to implead an auction purchaser of regulated property, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal allowed the application after the respondent bank raised no objection. The consequential amendment was directed to be carried out by the registry.
Application to implead auction purchaser is allowed; consequential amendment directed to registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 354/2023
In
Appeal on Diary No.745/2023 Between
Seema Ayaz Maniyar … Appellant/s V/s.
Axis Bank Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. G. Kinkhabwala, along with Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Sejal Tambe, i/b Mr Alok Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No. Bank.
-: Order dated: 07/06/2023:-
I.A. No. 354/2023 is for impleading the auction purchaser who
purchased the property during the pendency of the proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (D.R.T.).
The Respondent Bank has no objection to allowing this application. Hence, the application is allowed and the consequential amendment shall be carried out before the Registry before the next date of hearing.
Post on 09.06.2023 for hearing.
Chairperson
rm-21
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the impleadment of the auction purchaser as a party to the proceedings.
Seema Ayaz Maniyar
Axis Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
